Posts Tagged rant

So you say your name is “Bill”

I don’t think I can take any more phony corporate BS. I just got off a customer service call with a rep in India. I really can’t stand all this “please sir, thank you sir” stuff, and what I really can’t stand is when they ask how my day is going. Do the corporate overlings really think having their people query my emotional state will make me more pleased with my phone experience?

And the fact that he asked, “did you have a good day” at 9:15am completely gives away that he isn’t anywhere near my time zone, even though his employer has attempted to conceal this fact by changing his name to “Bill”. I think that’s what bugs me the most. First, they make the poor guy pretend he’s interested in my day, and then on top of it he has to use a fake name because his real one might creep me our or something. Honestly, the only thing I really care about was being able to understand him, and frankly, his English was better than that of most high school seniors here in the US.

,

No Comments

Response to religious spam

I just got this message through Facebook:

If I believe in God and life after death and you do not, and if there is no God, we both lose when we die. However, if there is a God, you still lose and I gain everything

,

No Comments

Maybe I just don’t understand this “math” stuff…

On the way to work this morning a reporter on NPR was talking about funding for some sort of early childhood development program. Towards the end he reported that a study had found, “a 16% increase in student performance for every dollar invested in the program,” and that, “the program’s budget is 160 million dollars.” I’m really happy about this. I think it’s great that our children’s performance will be boosted by 10,960%.

Seriously, though, he probably meant for every dollar invested per student per year. That still doesn’t make sense, though. If that were the case, it would mean that a $7 investment would more than double a child’s performance. If that’s true, I want me some of that program because DANG it’s effective!

,

No Comments

Do you ever get the feeling that some dating sites are fake?

I just saw this banner ad. I have to say, Julie and Mac certainly bear a striking resemblance, especially for being 5 years apart. Also, although I have no idea where Lakewood or Thornton are, Denver is definitely not “my area”. Seriously, the least they could do is fetch my large chested and overtly militaristic fake women from somewhere in Minnesota. Sheesh.

No Comments

Dell Hell

I just had to post this… it’s too amusing. I was trying to figure out how much volume licensing for Adobe Flash costs. A brief summary:

1:30pm - Call Adobe, wait on hold for 25 minutes, told to call Dell because Adobe does not actually sell its products directly. Right… Customer: “Here, here’s some money. I want to give it to you.” Adobe: “I’m sorry, see that guy over there? You have to go talk to him for a while, then give him the money, and then he will give some of it to me.”

2:00pm - Call the number for Dell that Adobe gave me. None of the options sound at all like what I want, but it says to stay on the line. I stay on the line and am connected to a person who collects my name, email address and phone number, makes me wait on hold for several minutes at a time while she tries to figure out if they even offer what I want. Eventually she says that she has can’t help me but she has found the correct department to transfer me to. She then gives me an incident number and emails the results of our conversation to me (for a transfer? Sheesh!)

2:20pm - After waiting on hold for a while someone finally picks up. He has no idea what I am talking about and doesn’t even know who these “Adobe” people are or what this “Flash” thinger is that I claim they sell. He says that I need to be in the Consumer Purchasing department.

2:25pm - This department has by far the best response. My question of how much Adobe Flash volume pricing costs is met first with a long silence, and then with, “sir, may I have your order number?”. We are both confused until she explains that I have arrived at the Customer Service department, not the Customer Purchasing department. I am transferred to the Sales department

2:30pm - The Sales department doesn’t know what Adobe Flash is. I explain that it is a software application. They transfer me to the Software Sales department.

2:35pm - The Software Sales department can’t find any volume licensing information, so they transfer me to the Business Software Sales department.

2:40pm - And again, I am in the wrong department. The automated menu offers information about 1) printers, 2) peripherals, 3) toner and ink, 4) monitors. I am instructed to stay on the line if none of the options are correct. I stay on the line. Dell hangs up on me.

2:45pm - I call CDW instead and within 5 minutes they are able to tell me not only that they do, in fact, sell volume licensing, but also how much it costs =D. Unfortunately, the volume licensing costs $10 more per seat than the standard licensing costs directly from Adobe =(.

I have decided that the rest of the world has gone insane today.

,

No Comments

R i i i i i i i g h t…

I was listening to MPR over lunch today. They were interviewing Pawlenty. One of the questions for him was whether or not he supported instant runoff voting. He said

1. I support third parties.
2. If third parties get more votes than Rep’s or Dem’s, that’s good.
3. I do not support IRV because it hurts third parties. Things would be harder for third parties if we had IRV (no explanation was given).

Ok, first, WTF? 1) What is he thinking? Harder for third parties to win when people can vote for them without worrying that their second preference will lose because of it? Sure Tim, we’re buying that. 2) What was the host thinking not questioning him on that? I can’t stand it when politicians are allowed to just spit out something blatantly false and the host is just like “oh, yes, ok, let’s be objective and not pass judgment, on to the next question!”

Thankfully another caller got on and said “no offense governor, but I wanted to vote for Hutchinson and was forced to vote for Hatch because I wanted you out of office more than I wanted Hutchinson to get a tiny bit higher percentage of the votes and still not win. What you said doesn’t make any sense. Justify yourself.” Pawlenty again whipped out the BS and said:

1) Now, let’s not be hasty, remember that Perot took votes away from Bush in 1992 and caused Clinton to win. (WTF? Look dumbass, the caller wasn’t complaining that republicans are repressing him by using third parties against democrats. He was saying that in general, a system that forces you to choose between who you really want to win and who actually has a decent shot at winning is not good.)
2) I think it’s important that people have to choose between candidates. It wouldn’t be a legitimate victory if you didn’t have to choose one candidate over another. (Um. Yeah. And how does that make sense? You want it to be more difficult for third parties to win? Oh, did I say that? I’m sorry, you’re right. There must be something inherently more valuable in forcing voters to choose between their ideal candidate and their preference between the two who actually stand a chance of winning. As you suggest, I’m sure keeping our current system really is the best way to help third parties. You lying shmuck!)

And again the host just let him BS his way out of the question. Shame, shame Gary Eichten.

Update: You should look at the comments too, there’s some good stuff.

,

No Comments